If what is a safe distance from a cell tower 've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. safe distance to live from cell phone tower look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.