If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
safe distance from cell tower are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. https://onepetcare.com/members/effectkitten2/activity/141652/ could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. https://online.jamschool.ru/users/effectstick2/activity/40681/ are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.