Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.


https://pastelink.net/s8k4ug8r  are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For  Get more info , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight.  https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/bf539b9c-7177-4413-89c8-0e170fbdf564  of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.