If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, what is a safe distance from a cell tower and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.