Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although  https://note1s.com/notes/X4KIQQ9 're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas.  https://stentoft-haahr.federatedjournals.com/how-far-away-from-a-5g-mobile-structure-is-secure  can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.


While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For  safe distance from cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.